Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 638 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in League of Legends than Core i7-7700 - 166 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $167.0 vs $197.65
- Up to 13% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.03 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
86%
Price, $
$197.65
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |