Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1923 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $197.65 vs $209.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 385 vs 348 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.55 vs $0.57 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
348
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
96%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
385
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |