Buy on Amazon
$225.1
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 164 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $222.99 vs $225.1
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
96.95121951219512%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$225.1
99%
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $222.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
76.0143198090692%
Multi-Core
7454
88.46427723712318%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
