Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 895 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $197.65 vs $210.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 231 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.91 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
94%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12699 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12699 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |