Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 277 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $129.00 vs $225.10
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.62 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |