Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1210 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 286 vs 273 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $76.80 vs $225.10
- Up to 67% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.27 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 58 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$76.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |