Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700K is 363 days older than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $197.65 vs $208.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 233 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.89 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
94%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |