Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13500 is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $197.65 vs $244.85
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13500 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 27% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 142 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.72 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
78%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
97%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.85
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |