Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 575 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - $197.65 vs $208.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Far Cry 6 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 131 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.6 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
119
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
96%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |