Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 895 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $225.1 vs $259.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 191 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
172
90.0523560209424%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$225.1
100%
Buy for $225.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for $259.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
59.81220657276995%
Multi-Core
7454
84.5508166969147%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |