Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $209.99 vs $294.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14600KF - $1.59 vs $2.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - 137 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
132
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$209.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10701 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
73%
Price, $
$294.99
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |