Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 381 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $197.65 vs $780.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10940X - $1.88 vs $7.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 110 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 28 vs 24 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
95%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
Buy for $780 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Colfax | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |