Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $221.76 vs $780.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10940X - $1.31 vs $4.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10940X - 32 vs 28 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $780 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
94%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |