Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $221.76 vs $244.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 187 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.31 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
157
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
92%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.99
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |