Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 252 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 538 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $210.0 vs $221.76
- Up to 7% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.39 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
529
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
92%
Price, $
$221.76
94%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
538
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |