Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700K is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $221.76 vs $275.13
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 25% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 180 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.53 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
144
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.54/FPS
99%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3887 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.13
80%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3887 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |