Buy on Amazon
$221.76
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $221.76 vs $225.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 280 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.8 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
271
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
97%
Price, $
$221.76
100%
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7702 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
