Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-8700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-8700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 56 days older than the cheaper Core i7-8700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Up to 6% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $208.0 vs $221.76
- Up to 6% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.17 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
93%
Price, $
$221.76
93%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3970 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |