Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 299 vs 291 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $184.0 vs $244.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.62 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
291
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
73%
Price, $
$244.99
75%
Buy for $244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
299
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$184
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |