Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 226 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $208.99 vs $799.95
- Up to 75% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.92 vs $3.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for $799.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$208.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $208.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |