Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-10700F - 193 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $175.0 vs $201.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73792 minutes ago
Buy for $201.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
73.74199451052151%
Multi-Core
7231
84.28721296188367%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |