Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-7700K - 131 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $225.0 vs $230.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i7-7700K - $1.72 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 20 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |