Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3008 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-540 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 54 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $60.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 10% better value when playing Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - $0.55 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1747 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |