Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-540 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-540 is 1020 days older than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-6300 - $60.0 vs $74.04
- Up to 19% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6300 - $0.39 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 6 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1980 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |