Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 16% cheaper than Pentium Gold G6405 - $74.04 vs $88.2
- Up to 13% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Pentium Gold G6405 - $0.39 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-6300 - 196 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
86%
Price, $
$88.2
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $88.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |