Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $74.04 vs $109.99
- Up to 33% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.37 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6300 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
67%
Price, $
$109.99
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |