Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 967 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 235 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $94.99 vs $109.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.4 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
232
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
85%
Price, $
$109.99
86%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5605 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |