Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 730 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $99.9 vs $109.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.45 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
90%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
