Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2426 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Core i7-2600K - 705 vs 682 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $85.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 25% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.12 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
705
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
75%
Price, $
$109.99
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8127 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |