Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 675 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $98.15 vs $109.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.5 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
89%
Price, $
$109.99
89%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |