Buy on Amazon
$109.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2138 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-2700K - 248 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $89.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 11% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.39 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
248
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
88%
Price, $
$109.99
80%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7436 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-2700K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72700K
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i7-2700K
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
