Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 842 vs 750 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $108.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.13 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
750
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
86%
Price, $
$109.99
98%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
842
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |