Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1293 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Pentium Gold G6405 - 259 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $99.95 vs $109.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.4 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 58 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
95%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
248
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |