Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 730 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $100.0 vs $109.99
- Up to 8% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.34 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
91%
Price, $
$109.99
90%
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5776 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5776 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |