Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $74.04 vs $99.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-7600 - $0.39 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 10% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-6300 - 207 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3337 minutes ago
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |