Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 and the cheaper Core i3-7100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-7100 - 177 vs 176 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $39.99 vs $95.97
- Up to 59% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-7600 - $0.2 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
40.816326530612244%
Price, $
$95.97
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
176
99.43502824858757%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1247
90.82301529497451%
Multi-Core
2440
64.0083945435467%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |