Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4930K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4930K is 313 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $74.04 vs $89.95
- Up to 15% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-4930K - $0.63 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6300 - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3888 minutes ago
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3887 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |