Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 13% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4930K - 176 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - $84.99 vs $89.95
- Up to 17% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4930K - $0.48 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4930K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |