Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3360 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-6300 - 204 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-6300 - $59.99 vs $74.04
- Up to 26% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than FX-6300 - $0.29 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 557 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 557 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |