Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3131 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 33% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3250 - 190 vs 143 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 40% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $48.0 vs $79.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Celeron G6900 - $0.34 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10073 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10065 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |