Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-7350K - 211 vs 195 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 14% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $51.6 vs $59.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing Diablo IV than Celeron G6900 - $0.26 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11889 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
195
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |