Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Remnant II than Core i3-9100F - 90 vs 87 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 5% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $56.99 vs $59.99
- Up to 1% better value when playing Remnant II than Celeron G6900 - $0.66 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11483 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
87
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |