Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4380 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i3-540 - 279 vs 250 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $60.0 vs $79.99
- Up to 17% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G6900 - $0.24 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10073 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 73 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |