Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7400T - 110 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $49.99 vs $75.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7400T - $0.45 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
90.9090909090909%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
57.692307692307686%
Price, $
$75
66%
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |