Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460 is 968 days older than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 35 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400T - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $64.04 vs $78.02
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400T - $0.51 vs $0.63 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |