Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2501 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $64.04 vs $87.98
- Up to 13% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i3-10105F - $0.47 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 21% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-4460 - 164 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 8 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
135
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
87%
Price, $
$87.98
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |