Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 2186 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Core i7-2600K - 178 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $78.02 vs $85.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-2600K - $0.44 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |