Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 and the cheaper Core i5-7400T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $75.0 vs $95.97
- Up to 19% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-7600 - $0.64 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - 121 vs 117 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
96.69421487603306%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
81.0126582278481%
Price, $
$95.97
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
74.07137654770575%
Multi-Core
2806
73.6096537250787%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |