Buy on Amazon
$52
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 455 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 196 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $52.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 25% better value when playing Valheim than Celeron G4900 - $0.27 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57400T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7400T Processor
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3358 minutes ago
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-7400T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
