Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $39.9 vs $52.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - $0.36 vs $0.44 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13859 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
112
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |